Corning Inc. v. DSM IP Assets B.V., IPR2013-00043, Paper 98, IPR2013-00044, Paper 96 (June 5, 2014), the Board had difficulty determining what points Corning believed the Board misapprehended or overlooked, and dismissed the request without prejudice.  The Board gave Coring driectino on how to file a request for rehearing:

On page ___ the Final Written Decision states ___. A point that the Decision is believed to have overlooked [or misapprehended] is ___. The point was set forth in ___ Petition [or Reply] _ at page ___. Explain why overlooked or misapprehended point is significant.