Can’t Sneak in Another Argument

Posted on by

In Rackspace Hosting, Inc. v. Rotatable Technologies, LLC, IPR2013-00248, Paper 27  (April 9, 2014), the petitioner submited a seven page requiest for oral argument including arguments,  The Board noted that while a request may provide a short list of arguments to be raised, detailed briefing is not proper in the request, and therefore expunged the paper, after duly noting the request for oral argument.

This entry was posted in Uncategorized by Bryan Wheelock. Bookmark the permalink.

About Bryan Wheelock

Education J.D., Washington University in St. Louis B.S.E. in Mechanical Engineering, Duke University Bryan Wheelock's practice includes preparation and prosecution of patent and trademark applications and drafting of intellectual property agreements, including non-compete agreements. He has brought and defended lawsuits in federal and state courts relating to intellectual property and has participated in seizures of counterfeit and infringing goods. Bryan prepares and prosecutes U.S. and foreign patent applications for medical devices, mechanical and electromechanical devices, manufacturing machinery and processes, metal alloys and other materials. He also does a substantial amount of patentability searching, trademark availability searching and patent and trademark infringement studies. In addition to his practice at Harness Dickey, Bryan is an Adjunct Professor at Washington University School of Law and Washington University School of Engineering.