Institution Decisions
In CAO Group, Inc. v. The Procter & Gamble Company, IPR2-14-00796, Paper 18 (November 6, 2014), the Board denied inter partes review of claims 1 to 13 of U.S. Patent No. 5,989,569.
In Global Tel*Link Corporation v. Securus Technologies, Inc., IPR2014-00810, Paper 8 (November 26, 2014) the Board instituted inter partes review of claims 1–8 of U.S. Patent No. 7,324,637.
In Eastman Kodak Company v. CTP Innovations, LLC, IPR2-14-00788, Paper 9 (November 26, 2014) the Board instituted inter partes review of claims 10–20 (all of the challenged claims) of U.S. Patent No. 6,738,155.
In L-3 Communications Holdings, Inc. v. Power Survey LLC, IPR2014-00834, Paper 9 (November 26, 2014), the Board instituted inter partes review of 1–5 and 8 of U.S. Patent No. 8,482,274.
In L-3 Communications Holdings, Inc. v. Power Survey LLC, IPR2014-00836, Paper 9 (November 26, 2014), the Board instituted inter partes review of claims 1–5 and 8 of U.S. Patent No. 8,536,856.
In Nautique Boat Company, Inc. v. Malibu Boats, LLC, IPR2014-01045, Paper 13 (November 26, 2014), the Board instituted inter partes review of claims 1–5, 8–11, 13–16, and 18–20 of U.S. Patent 8,539,897 (but not challenged claims 6-7, 12, and 17).
Dispositions
In Panasonic System Networks Co., Ltd. v. 6115187 CANADA INC., IPR2014-01438, Paper 11 (November 26, 2014), the Board terminated the inter partes review on the joint motion of the parties.