In Seoul Semiconductor Co., Ltd. v. Enplas Corporation, IPR2014-00605, Paper 13 (October 16, 2014), the Board authorized the Patent Owner to move for additional discovery about testing that Petitioner conducted .  The Board noted that “[u]nder 37 C.F.R. § 42.65(b), If a party relies on a technical test or data from such a test, the party must provide an affidavit explaining: (1) Why the test or data is being used; (2) How the test was performed and the data was generated; (3) How the data is used to determine a value; (4) How the test is regarded in the relevant art; and (5) Any other information necessary for the Board to evaluate the test and data.”  The Board settled the other discovery issues as it usually does, suggesting that the parties cooperate and authorizing the patent owner to again request permission to file another request for additional discovery.