September 5, 2014

Posted on by

Institution Decisions

FLIR Systems, Inc. v. Leak Surveys, Inc., IPR2014-00411 , Paper 8 (September 5, 2014), the Board instituted inter partes review of claims 1-58 (all of the claims) of U.S. Patent No. 8,426,813.

FLIR Systems, Inc. v. Leak Surveys, Inc., IPR2014-00608, Paper 8 (September 5, 2014), the Board denied inter partes review of claims 1-58 (all of the claims) of U.S. Patent No. 8,426,813.

FLIR Systems, Inc. v. Leak Surveys, Inc., IPR2014-00434 , Paper 8 (September 5, 2014), the Board instituted inter partes review of claims 1-7 and 9-20 of U.S. Patent No. 8,193,496.

FLIR Systems, Inc. v. Leak Surveys, Inc., IPR2014-00608, Paper 8 (September 5, 2014), the Board denied inter partes review of claims 1-7 and 9-20 of U.S. Patent No. 8,193,496.

In Dorman Products, Inc. v. Paccar Inc., IPR2014-00542, Paper 10 (September 5, 2014), the Board denied inter partes review of US Patent No. D525,731.

In ARM, Inc. v. Vantage Point Technology, Inc., IPR2014-00467, Paper 10 (September 10, 2014), the Board denied inter partes review of claims 1 and 8 of U.S. Patent No. 5,463,750.

Rehearing Decisions

In Microsoft Corporation v. VirnetX Inc., IPR2014-00558, Paper 16 (September 5, 2014), the Board denied petitioner’s request for rehearing of the decision to not institute inter partes review of U.S. Patent 7,188,180 because of the one year bar of 35 USC 315(b).

In Microsoft Corporation v. VirnetX Inc., IPR2014-00401, Paper 14 (September 5, 2014), the Board denied petitioner’s request for rehearing of the decision to not institute inter partes review of U.S. Patent 7,188,180 because of the one year bar of 35 USC 315(b).

In Microsoft Corporation v. VirnetX Inc., IPR2014-00405, Paper 14 (September 5, 2014), the Board denied petitioner’s request for rehearing of the decision to not institute inter partes review of U.S. Patent 7,188,180 because of the one year bar of 35 USC 315(b).

 

 

 

 

 

 

This entry was posted in Inter Partes Review by Bryan Wheelock. Bookmark the permalink.

About Bryan Wheelock

Education J.D., Washington University in St. Louis B.S.E. in Mechanical Engineering, Duke University Bryan Wheelock's practice includes preparation and prosecution of patent and trademark applications and drafting of intellectual property agreements, including non-compete agreements. He has brought and defended lawsuits in federal and state courts relating to intellectual property and has participated in seizures of counterfeit and infringing goods. Bryan prepares and prosecutes U.S. and foreign patent applications for medical devices, mechanical and electromechanical devices, manufacturing machinery and processes, metal alloys and other materials. He also does a substantial amount of patentability searching, trademark availability searching and patent and trademark infringement studies. In addition to his practice at Harness Dickey, Bryan is an Adjunct Professor at Washington University School of Law and Washington University School of Engineering.