July 10, 2010

Posted on by

New Petitions Filed

Actavis, Inc. filed IPR2014-01126 (July 10, 2014) challenging U.S. Patent No. RE38,551.

NEC Corporation of America filed IPR2014-001131 (July 10, 2014) challenging U.S. Patent No. 6,819.923, assigned to Nokia Siemens Networks OY.

NEC Corporation of America filed IPR2014-001132 (July 10, 2014) challenging U.S. Patent No. 7,215,962, assigned to Nokia Siemens Networks GmbH & Co., KG.

Pantech Co. Ltd. filed IPR2014-001133 (July 10, 2014) challenging U.S. Patent No. 7,218,923, assigned to Nokia Siemens Networks OY.

Amazon.com, Inc., filed IPR2014-001134 (July 10, 2014) challenging U.S. Patent No. 7,914,174 assigned to Siemens AG.

HTC Corporation filed IPR2014-001135 (July 10, 2014) challenging U.S. Patent No. 6,377,804, assigned to Nokia Siemens Networks OY.

HTC Corporation filed IPR2014-001136 (July 10, 2014) challenging U.S. Patent No. 8,055,820, assigned to Cellular Communications Equipment LLC.

Institution Decisions

In Jack Henry And Associates, Inc. v. DataTreasury Corporation,  CBM2014-00056 (July 10, 2014), the Board granted covered business method review of claims 42 and 43 (but not challenged claims  1, 2, 16, 18, 26, 27, 29, 36, and 38) of U.S. Patent No. 6,032,137.

In Jack Henry And Associates, Inc. v. DataTreasury Corporation, CBM2014-00057 (July 10, 2014), the Board granted covered business method review of claims 42 and 43 (but not challenged claims 1, 2, 16, 18, 26, 27, 29, 36, and 38) of U.S. Patent No. 6,032,137.

Square, Inc. v.REM Holdings 3, LLC, IPR2014-00312, Paper 12 (July 10, 2014), the Board instituted inter partes review of claims 1-17 of U.S. Patent No. 8,584,946.

Purdue Pharma L.P. v. Depomed, Inc., IPR2014-00378, Paper 10 (July 10, 2014), the Board instituted inter partes review of claims 1, 8-10, 13-15, 61-62 (but not challenged claims 10 and 11) of U.S. Patetn No. 6,340,475.

Euro-Pro Operating LLC v. Acorne Enterprises, LLC, IPR2014-00351, Paper 19 (July 10, 2014), the Board instituted inter partes review of claims 1, 13, and 14 of U.S. Patent No. 6,515,262.

SAP America, Inc. v. Clouding IP, LLC, IPR2014-00308, Paper 8 (July 8, 2014), the Board instituted inter partes review of claims 1-9 of U.S. Patent No. 5,825,891.

 

Final Written Decisions

Harmonic Inc. v. Avid Technology, Inc., IPR2013-00232, Paper 27 (July 10, 2014), the Board held that claims 1-10 of U.S. Patent No. 5,495,291 were unpatentable (but not claims 11-16).

NuVasive, Inc. Waraw Orthopedic, Inc., IPR2013-00206, Paper 65, (July 10, 2014), the Board held that claims 17–23 of U.S. Patent No. 8,251,997 were unpatentable, but not challenged claims 9–16 and 24–30.

NuVasive, Inc. Waraw Orthopedic, Inc., IPR2013-00208, Paper 62, (July 10, 2014), the Board held that claims 1–8 of U.S. Patent No. 8,251,997 were unpatentable.

 

 

This entry was posted in Covered Business Methods, Inter Partes Review by Bryan Wheelock. Bookmark the permalink.

About Bryan Wheelock

Education J.D., Washington University in St. Louis B.S.E. in Mechanical Engineering, Duke University Bryan Wheelock's practice includes preparation and prosecution of patent and trademark applications and drafting of intellectual property agreements, including non-compete agreements. He has brought and defended lawsuits in federal and state courts relating to intellectual property and has participated in seizures of counterfeit and infringing goods. Bryan prepares and prosecutes U.S. and foreign patent applications for medical devices, mechanical and electromechanical devices, manufacturing machinery and processes, metal alloys and other materials. He also does a substantial amount of patentability searching, trademark availability searching and patent and trademark infringement studies. In addition to his practice at Harness Dickey, Bryan is an Adjunct Professor at Washington University School of Law and Washington University School of Engineering.