Institution Decisions<\/p>\n
In United States Endoscopy Group, Inc. v. CDx Diagnostics, Inc.<\/em>, \u00a0IPR2014-00642, Paper 7 (October 16, 2014), the\u00a0Board instituted inter partes<\/em> review of claims 1-39 of U.S. Patent No. 6,258,044 (all of the challenged claims).<\/p>\n In IGB Automotive Ltd. v.\u00a0Gentherm GmbH<\/em>, IPR2014-00661, Paper 9 (October 16, 2014), the Board instituted inter partes<\/em> review of claims 1, 3, 4, 6,\u00a011, 13, 14, 16, 18, and 20 of U.S. Patent No. 7,735,932 (but not challenged claim 7).<\/p>\n In Toshiba Corporation v. ZOND LLC<\/em>, IPR2014-01065,\u00a0Paper 11, (October 16, 2014), the Board instituted inter partes<\/em> review of claims claims 14\u201318 and 25\u201332 (all of the challenged claims) of U.S. Patent No. 7,604,716.<\/p>\n In Toshiba Corporation v. ZOND LLC<\/em>, IPR2014-01067,\u00a0Paper 11, (October 16, 2014), the Board instituted inter partes<\/em> review of claims 19\u201324 (all of the\u00a0challenged claims) of U.S. Patent No. 7,604,716.<\/p>\n In United States Postal Service v. Return Mail, Inc., CBM2014-00116, Paper 11\u00a0(October 16, 2014), the Board instituted covered business method review of claims 39\u201344 (all of the challenge claims) of U.S. Patent No. 6,826,548.<\/p>\n Dispositions<\/strong><\/p>\n In Trulia, Inc. v. Zillow, Inc., CBM2013-00056, Paper 44\u00a0(October 16. 2014), the Board terminated the covered business method review on the joint motion of the parties.<\/p>\n Joinder Motions<\/strong><\/p>\n In Toshiba Corporation v. ZOND LLC<\/em>, IPR2014-01065,\u00a0Paper 12, (October 16, 2014) the Board granted petitioner’s motion to join the proceeding with IPR2014-00807.<\/p>\n In Toshiba Corporation v. ZOND LLC<\/em>, IPR2014-01067,\u00a0Paper 12, (October 16, 2014) the Board granted petitioner’s motion to join the proceeding with IPR2014-00808.<\/p>\n Rehearing<\/p>\n In Travelocity.com LP v. Cronos Technologies LLC<\/em>,\u00a0CBM2014-00082,\u00a0Paper 12 (October 16, 2014), the Board denied rehearing of its decision not to institute covered business method review.<\/p>\n In\u00a0Histologics, LLC v. CDx Diagnostics, Inc.<\/em>,\u00a0IPR2014-00779, Paper 12 (October 16, 2014), the Board denied rehearing of its decision not to institute inter partes\u00a0review.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":" Institution Decisions In United States Endoscopy Group, Inc. v. CDx Diagnostics, Inc., \u00a0IPR2014-00642, Paper 7 (October 16, 2014), the\u00a0Board instituted inter partes review of claims 1-39 of U.S. Patent No. 6,258,044 (all of the challenged claims). In IGB Automotive Ltd. … Continue reading