{"id":1569,"date":"2014-10-15T19:43:43","date_gmt":"2014-10-15T23:43:43","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/aia.harnessip.com\/?p=1569"},"modified":"2014-10-22T10:06:36","modified_gmt":"2014-10-22T14:06:36","slug":"october-15-2014","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/aia.harnessip.com\/?p=1569","title":{"rendered":"October 15, 2014"},"content":{"rendered":"

Institution Decisions<\/strong><\/p>\n

In Microsoft Corporation v. VirnetX, Inc.<\/em>,\u00a0IPR2014-00610, Paper 9 (October 15, 2014) the\u00a0Board instituted inter partes<\/em> review of claims 1, 2, 6\u20138, and 12\u201314 of U.S. Patent No. 7,490,151.<\/p>\n

In Microsoft Corporation v. VirnetX, Inc.<\/em>,\u00a0IPR2014-00615, Paper 9,\u00a0Case IPR2014-00612,\u00a0Patent No. 9, IPR2014-00613, Paper 9, and IPR2014-00614, Paper 9, (October 15, 2014), the Board instituted inter partes review of claims 1, 2, 6, 14\u201317, 19\u201323, 26\u201341, 43\u201347, and 50\u201360 of U.S. Patent No. 7,418,504 (all of the challenged claims) and consolidated those proceedings.<\/p>\n

In Microsoft Corporation v. VirnetX, Inc.<\/em>,\u00a0IPR2014-00615, Paper 9,\u00a0Case IPR2014-00616,\u00a0Patent No. 9, IPR2014-00618, (October 15, 2014) the\u00a0Board denied inter partes<\/em> review of\u00a0\u00a01, 2, 6, 14\u201317, 19\u201323, 26\u201341, 43\u201347, and 50\u2013 60 of U.S. Patent No. 7,921,211 (43 claims) in\u00a0 IPR2014-00616. but instituted inter partes<\/em> review in IPR2014-00615 and IPR2014-00618, and consolidated those proceedings.<\/p>\n

In Ford Motor Company v.\u00a0Vehicle Operation Technologies, LLC.<\/em>, IPR2014-00594, Paper 26 (October 15, 2014), the Board instituted inter partes review of\u00a0claims\u00a0of claims 1\u201315, 21\u201328, and 41\u201344of U.S. Patent No. 7,145,442 (all\u00a027 of the challenged claims).<\/p>\n

In Ford Motor Company v.\u00a0Vehicle Operation Technologies, LLC.<\/em>, IPR2014-00600, Paper 26 (October 15, 2014), the Board instituted inter partes review of\u00a0claims\u00a0of claims 1\u201315, 21, 22, 24\u201328, and 41\u201344 of U.S. Patent No. 7,145,442 (all 36 of the challenged claims).<\/p>\n

In BMW North America, LLC v.\u00a0Vehicle Operation Technologies, LLC.<\/em>, IPR2014-00601, Paper 26 (October 15, 2014), the Board instituted inter partes review of\u00a0claims\u00a0of claims 1\u201315, 21, 22, 24\u201328, and 41\u201344 of U.S. Patent No. 7,145,442 (all 36 of the challenged claims).<\/p>\n

In BMW North America, LLC v.\u00a0Vehicle Operation Technologies, LLC.,<\/em> IPR2014-00602, Paper 26 (October 15, 2014), the Board instituted inter partes review of\u00a0claims\u00a0of claims 1\u201315, 21, 22, 24\u201328, and 41\u201344 of U.S. Patent No. 7,145,442 (all 36 of the challenged claims).<\/p>\n

In BMW North America, LLC v.\u00a0Vehicle Operation Technologies, LLC.,<\/em> IPR2014-00603, Paper 30 (October 15, 2014), the Board instituted inter partes review of\u00a0claims 1\u201315, 21\u201328, and 41\u201344 of U.S. Patent No. 7,145,442 (all 27 of the challenged claims).<\/p>\n

In The Gillette Company v. Zond LLC<\/em>, \u00a0IPR2014-00604, Paper 9 (October 15, 2014), the Board instituted inter partes<\/em> review of claims 30\u201337 of U.S. Patent No. 6,896,775.<\/p>\n

In\u00a0Fujitsu Semiconductor Limited v. Zond LLC<\/em>, IPR2014-00846, Paper 12 (October 15, 2014) the Board instituted inter partes review of claims 14\u201318 and 25\u201332 (all the challenged claims) of U.S. Patent No. 7,604,716.<\/p>\n

In\u00a0Fujitsu Semiconductor Limited v. Zond LLC<\/em>, IPR2014-00849, Paper 11 (October 15, 2014) the Board instituted inter partes review of claims 19\u201324 (all the challenged claims) of U.S. Patent No. 7,604,716.<\/p>\n

In Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Company, Ltd. v. Zond LLC<\/em>, \u00a0IPR2014-00807, Paper\u00a010 (October 15, 2014) the Board instituted\u00a0inter partes<\/em> review of claims 14\u201318 and 25\u201332 (all the challenged claims) of U.S. Patent No. 7,604,716.<\/p>\n

In Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Company, Ltd. v. Zond LLC<\/em>, \u00a0IPR2014-00808, Paper\u00a09 (October 15, 2014) the Board instituted\u00a0inter partes<\/em> review of claims 19\u201324 (\u201cthe challenged claims\u201d) of U.S. Patent No. 7,604,716.<\/p>\n

In IGB Automotive Ltd. v. Gentherm GmbH, IPR2014-00667, Paper 7 (October 15, 2014), the Board instituted inter partes review of claims 1\u20136 (all of the challenged claims) of U.S. Patent No. 7,637,573.<\/p>\n

Joinder<\/strong><\/p>\n

In\u00a0Fujitsu Semiconductor Limited v. Zond LLC<\/em>, IPR2014-00846, Paper 12 (October 15, 2014) the Board granted petitioner’s motion to join the proceeding with IPR2014-00808.<\/p>\n

In\u00a0Fujitsu Semiconductor Limited v. Zond LLC<\/em>, IPR2014-00849, Paper 12 (October 15, 2014), the Board granted petitioner’s motion to join the proceeding with IPR2014-00807.<\/p>\n

Rehearing<\/strong><\/p>\n

Catapult Innovations Pty Ltd. v. adidas AG, DER2014-00005, Paper 15, DER2014-00006, Paper 21\u00a0(October 15, 2014), the Board denied rehearing of\u00a0the Board\u2019s decision denying institution of a derivation proceeding.<\/p>\n

 <\/p>\n

 <\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

Institution Decisions In Microsoft Corporation v. VirnetX, Inc.,\u00a0IPR2014-00610, Paper 9 (October 15, 2014) the\u00a0Board instituted inter partes review of claims 1, 2, 6\u20138, and 12\u201314 of U.S. Patent No. 7,490,151. In Microsoft Corporation v. VirnetX, Inc.,\u00a0IPR2014-00615, Paper 9,\u00a0Case IPR2014-00612,\u00a0Patent No. … Continue reading →<\/span><\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":2,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_jetpack_newsletter_access":"","_jetpack_dont_email_post_to_subs":false,"_jetpack_newsletter_tier_id":0,"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paywalled_content":false,"_jetpack_feature_clip_id":0,"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":"","jetpack_publicize_message":"","jetpack_publicize_feature_enabled":true,"jetpack_social_post_already_shared":true,"jetpack_social_options":{"image_generator_settings":{"template":"highway","default_image_id":0,"font":"","enabled":false},"version":2},"jetpack_post_was_ever_published":false},"categories":[9,10,4],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-1569","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-cbm","category-derivation","category-ipr"],"jetpack_publicize_connections":[],"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack_shortlink":"https:\/\/wp.me\/p4ZIpB-pj","_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/aia.harnessip.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/1569","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/aia.harnessip.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/aia.harnessip.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/aia.harnessip.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/users\/2"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/aia.harnessip.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcomments&post=1569"}],"version-history":[{"count":7,"href":"https:\/\/aia.harnessip.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/1569\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":1620,"href":"https:\/\/aia.harnessip.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/1569\/revisions\/1620"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/aia.harnessip.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fmedia&parent=1569"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/aia.harnessip.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcategories&post=1569"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/aia.harnessip.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Ftags&post=1569"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}